James Stephens

January 30, 2006

A Review Of The ExpoDisc Digital White Balance Filter

Filed under: Product Review — James Stephens @ 2:41 pm

This post details a brief review of the ExpoDisc Digital White Balance Filter, a prismatic device designed to assist with white balance calibration.

The Expodisc comes in different sizes to suit numerous lens thread sizes and simply pushes onto the front of the lens. Once in place it collects and averages light from a wide radius. Thus, it works via transmitted light, rather than reflected light like a gray card does.

There are 2 ways to obtain a white balance with the Expodisc.

Custom White(or Gray) Balance

  1. Capture an image with in-camera white balance set to Auto.
  2. Set the image using the ‘Custom White(or Gray) Balance’ feature of your camera.
  3. Snap away with the white balance taken care of in-camera.

Gray Frame Reference

  1. Capture an image with in-camera white balance set to the dominant light source.
  2. Snap away.
  3. Balance the reference image in Adobe Camera RAW (ACR) with the White Balance Tool and then synchronize the resulting white balance across other images.

    Note - If you shoot in Jpeg, instructions are provided with the product for post-process image correction in Adobe Photoshop.

There is obviously a question as to which method of these two methods is best. The ExpoDisc product manual doesn’t answer this question, but a representative at Expodisc expressed this opinion:


We recommend that users do a CUSTOM gray/white balance, "pre-process," in their camera right before taking pictures in any given scene/lighting condition. This is the best, most accurate and efficient way to use this tool. We realize that is not always possible with certain cameras or when time doesn't allow. If that is the case, then you can still do it in "post process" in the computer by photographing one frame with the Expo/Disc at any time in that particular lighting condition. You can set your camera to "auto exposure" for this, but NOT auto white balance.

(Read the full text of this message “here”).

In order to test the Expodisc I took a number of test shots of a Gretag Macbeth ColorChecker Chart chart under different lighting conditions. For each lighting condition I captured a Gray Reference image, an image of the MacBeth chart with camera white balance set to Auto (to adjust according to the Gray reference), a Custom White Balance, and lastly an image of the MacBeth chart with camera white balance set to Custom. I had an unambiguous way of testing that white balance was adjusted correctly, because if it was then the CC20 patch (2nd from bottom left) on the Chart shouldn’t cause a white balance change in the image when selected with Adobe Camera RAW’s white balance tool.

My recommendation from these tests is also to use the Custom White Balance over the Gray Frame Reference. Neither method is perfect, but it seems to me that there are additional inaccuracies in the Gray Frame Reference method which arise from having to set white balance correctly to the scene in-camera as opposed to leaving it set to Auto for Custom White Balance.

Conclusion

If you shoot Jpeg I would say that the ExpoDisc is a useful tool. Bear in mind though that in order to work most effectively one must capture reference images while pointing at the source of the light that falls on the image, and this often means standing where the intended subject is and facing back towards the intended shot position (something there often isn’t time or opportunity to do).

At some point since purchasing this item I made a transition to shooting RAW exclusively and am perfectly happy adjusting white balance by eye in Adobe Camera RAW, synchronizing betwen images where necessary.

I do use the ExpoDisc for one thing though, and that is to take a reference image and check for dust on the sensor once in a while.

4 Comments »

  1. “is a useful too.” I think you meant useful “tool”? :-)

    As someone who hasn’t found a huge advantage in shooting RAW images (especially since my camera’s RAW mode shoots RAW+JPEG), I was looking for reviews that said it did what they say it will and it makes your shooting and computer processing quicker and easier. But I don’t exactly get that from your comments. And it seems like an expensive toy to check for white balance reference and for dust spots on your sensor!

    I wish you could have gone into a little more depth for those of us looking to see if this is a worthwhile addition to our camera bag.

    Comment by Stew — August 26, 2006 @ 10:24 am

  2. Stew,

    Ah tool. Thanks a lot.

    I wish I could tell you the Expodisc is great …..

    For JPEG’s using the Expodisc is a somewhat time consuming extra step if you want to get White balance right. To get the best results you generally have to stand where the subject is/will be and aim back at the position where you will take the shot. Having captured a reference you then walk back and take the shot. In my mind that is a hassle I would want to avoid.

    I would estimate that somewhat that partiular about getting the right white balance would probably be particular about other aspects of their prhotography and would therefore be better off shooting RAW anyway.

    Since I shoot RAW exclusively I actually sold my Expodisc recently.

    Best,

    James

    Comment by James Stephens — August 29, 2006 @ 2:32 pm

  3. it has been my experience, that if i use the expodisc just before i shoot a aprticular scene that the colors & WB are spot on. i do NOT go around & point the camera at the light source. but i HAVE found that i need to adjust the exposure via the SS, & take the ‘picture’. remove the disc, set the camera thu the custom WB setting, & adjust the exposure for the scene.

    i have never shot raw, & so far in my experience, this process virtually eliminates the differences i have seen between RAW & jpeg. you talk about ahassle - the extra post-procesing steps in RAW strike me as far outweighing the steps i just described.

    i wish i had been present when you were selling your expodisc.

    jp

    Comment by joe — January 31, 2007 @ 8:44 pm

  4. A styrofoam cup shoved on the end of your lens will do the exact same thing for about two cents. Point is at the light source, just like the $90 filter. Don’t believe me…try it!

    Comment by Lance Haverkamp — July 27, 2007 @ 11:15 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress