James Stephens

January 5, 2006

Correcting For Lens Distortion

Filed under: Workflow — James Stephens @ 8:40 pm

I use a multi-pronged approach to correct for various lens effects, comprising distortions and other anomalies.

To correct for pincushion distortion and its opposite, barrel distortion, I use PTlens. PTlens is better for correcting these anomalies than Adobe Photoshop CS2 as it uses three coefficients (vs Photoshop’s one) and these are carefully computed for individual lenses so the plugin is able to operate automatically vs adjusting it via eye in the Photoshop case. On 1/1/06 I sent the author Thomas Niemann 17 calibration shots for a Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4 Di LD on a Canon 5D and received the calibration back that very evening. I loaded up some test images shot with Tamron lens, fixed them wit hthe plugin and was very impressed. All Canon lenses are profiled currently as well as many third party ones. PTlens is worth checking out.


The Birch Garden

The Birch Garden
Institute For Advanced Study

Canon 300D with Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4 XR Di lens @ ISO 100
(click image to enlarge)

To correct for chromatic aberration and vignetting I prefer to use Adobe Camera RAW (ACR) than PTlens or other apps as ACR does such an excellent job and it has the added benefit that it operates on the RAW file as opposed to the image data in Photoshop. Used in this way, chromatic aberration and vignetting can be removed completely. Thinking about it, I see no reason why an automatic approach such as PTlens uses couldn’t be applied to vignetting and if such a tool existed I would probably use it in favor of Camera RAW. If only someone would write one …..

To correct for perspective distortion I use Image Align Pro. Although Photoshop CS2’s Filter –> Distort –> Lens Correction is a capable tool I find the Image Align Pro plugin easier to use.

I haven’t tried DxO Optics Pro but would be interested to hear opinions.

3 Comments »

  1. My experience is showing DxO has an even more precise distortion correction capability than PTLens . PT Lens is a definitive improvement over nothing. But DxO is a 100% solution, not 90+%. The drawback is how it impacts workflow.

    Comment by Michael S — March 24, 2006 @ 9:18 am

  2. That’s good to know thanks.

    I’ve been waiting for them to support my Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4 XR Di on a Canon EOS 5D body and then I plan to give it a try.

    Best,

    James

    Comment by James Stephens — March 24, 2006 @ 11:58 am

  3. The results from OpticsPro are impressive - generally - but…

    Lack of lens support. I bought the ‘Elite’ version but DxO STILL do not provide modules for the Canon ‘Pro’ long lenses (and show no signs of doing so, even for the ‘Pro’ cameras). In that respect, PT Lens is better than ‘No Module’ of OpticsPro!

    Beyond that, I’m left wondering where DxO Labs are taking OpticsPro. They continue to win awards, but as mentioned by Michael S above, workflow is a problem. In essence, OpticsPro is now ‘interfering’ with my (Adobe-centric) workflow instead of easing it. About to be uninstalled in favour of PTLens/Noiseware,PKSharpener etc. IMHO, DxO Labs have ‘overdone’ it with OpticsPro and tried to offer too much instead of just the lens improvements.

    Mathew

    Comment by Mathew L — September 15, 2007 @ 9:37 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress